Dithers in Wonderland
Prime Minister Paul Martin has resorted to tough talk, emboldened, it seems, by his announced 13 billion on future military expenditures. There even seems to be a veiled threat to the US in reply to American comments about our relinquishing of sovereignty. He has been quoted as saying:
PS (11:55AM). See also Proud to be Canadian, and Tom Cerber at The Politic.
This is our airspace, we're a sovereign nation and you don't intrude on a sovereign nation's airspace without seeking permission.A few of things jump at me from this jewel:
- Sounds a lot like a Soviet apparatchik ready to shoot a Korean plane, doesn't it?
- A nation? A sovereign one? Which nation in this state is the sovereign one? The English-speaking one? The French-speaking one? Or is it the archipelago of aboriginal nations?
- Sovereignty can be asserted with words and with policy statements, but that is a world far different than the one in which sovereignty needs to be defended.
- Let us assume for a second that the US do not seek permission to "intrude" into our air space to take down a threatening missile. Does Martin understand where things go next? To say that an unauthorized violation of our air space is a violation of our sovereignty is just short of saying that such violation is akin to an act of war.
- An act of war is usually met with some force (unless one wants to run in the opposite direction and wish to set up a government in whatever our equivalent of Vichy might be. Alert, anyone?). What does Martin think we are going to do? No disrespect intended to our armed forces, but how in G-d's green earth will we defend our state sovereignty? With new helicopters? Will the French, the Germans, and the Secretary General come to our defense?
PS (11:55AM). See also Proud to be Canadian, and Tom Cerber at The Politic.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home